Kinda easy to appear to "get" Peppermint, when you're pretty much just using a text-to-speech engine to repeat this review verbatim:
https://www.linuxinsider.com/story/85421.htmland bits from our release announcement

[EDIT]
I'd agree the original article/review was generally pretty good, but unless it's by the same guy that YT video is just lazy I'm afraid

[EDIT2]
And C'mon reviewers, we changed the logo AGES ago .. keep up

(heck even the article you copied [?] had the right logo)
[EDIT3]
Can you tell I'm fed up with lazy reporting that just rehashes the same old drivel with no effort and/or attempt to get in touch and ask. I'll repeat again only ONE reviewer/article writer has EVER been in touch to ask about our goals and direction .. and that was this one (which isn't really a "review"):
http://www.linuxandubuntu.com/home/an-interview-with-peppermint-ceo-mark-greavesI'll only be happy when reviewers seek information from the horses mouth rather than old articles and opinion.
Unless of course they lord us with praise, and get everything right out of pure luck .. in which case I might let them off
